AACP Newsletter, Volume 7,
Number 2, Spring 1993
|
||
|
|
Letters and NotesTo the Editor: I read your article in the Autumn, 1992 Community Psychiatrist (Vol. 6, No. 4, pg. 1) on “Substance Use Disorders and the Language of Abuse.” Your points about using the terms “abuse” and “abuser” are well taken. However, I have a problem with referring to “patients” or “clients” as “consumers”. As you point out the language has a life of its own which transcends he meaning intended by an individual user (or users). If the idea catches on that patients or clients are merely consumers that means that those who treat them are merely business persons rather than professionals. Furthermore, it is hard enough to get appropriating bodies to provide funds for patients with illnesses let alone people who are consumers.
K-Lynn Paul, MD I believe that your concerns about the implications of the use of the term “consumer” are shared by many. One of them, Dr. Charles Huffine has contributed an essay on this topic to this edition of Community Psychiatrist as you may have noted (see page 6). I, personally, have mixed feelings on this particular use of terminology, and I agree that “consumer” implies a type of relationship that is somewhat shallow and mechanical. The more traditional “patient” or the newer “client” have flaws as well, and it is not clear to me that they are less troubling. In the end, in referring to groups of people, it seems to me that the easiest and least offensive approach is to call people what they wish to be called; at least until we find words we can all agree upon.
TO THE EDITOR: Here is our AMI - Eastside story. We have 53 “dues-paying members” and another 40 on our mailing list at this time. When NARSAD was started about six years ago, our affiliate discussed how we could raise money for brain disease research. After all, these are the diseases in which we are involved. Various types of fund-raisers were discussed. Then I said that although I had given up running marathons for two years, after having run six, that I would go back to the required training and would run a marathon if they would ask for pledges, donations, etc. In 1987, we raised $830. My health has remained excellent so I have continued to agree to run each year!! My legs are wondering if they have a vote!! We have subsequently raised $3025, $10400, $11200 and $15500 — over $40,000 in five years. I have always run the October Detroit International Marathon. Probably the biggest, in numbers, is the New York Marathon. It has always been in the back of my mind to do NY because of its higher profile — and the chance to raise even more money for NARSAD. I have received my entry for November 1. I am not really a “marathoner” because I finish well back in the pack. I should say that I “do” a marathon because I am doing some walking, and slow jogging, toward the end!! But the hurt in my legs cannot compare to the hurt of these brain diseases. So I am doing, once again, the necessary training which will enable me to finish the 26.2 miles, through the boroughs of New York this time, and probably in the area of five hours plus or minus ten minutes. NARSAD seemed to be impressed that I, as a 61-year old this year, would take the time to train for a marathon, etc. and last year I was elected to its Board. I was very honored and as long as I can accomplish the training and “do” the marathon, I will continue to enter one a year. Hopefully, research will find better medicines and other treatments for the present generation and for future generations, also. These are too often such devastating diseases—and of such an important organ. What can the AACP do? Here are some ideas:
Thomas B. Coles, Jr., MD
Back to Spring 1993 |
Email Webmaster:
|
| © Copyright 1993 AACP. |