
Mission
Current Business
Board
Join
ElectronicCommunity
Journal
Newsletter
Archive
Links
Conferences
Bulletin Board
Findings/Products
|
|
Guest Column:
Community Psychiatrists in the APA:
Focusing Towards the Future
In the 1840's when the
APA was formed, all psychiatry
was public psychiatry. This persisted into the 20th
century but following WWII, private and public settings
for mental health care delivery grew and became distinct
and separate. This was promoted by the availability of
medical insurance for psychiatric treatment, the
development and growth of Community Mental Health, and
an increase in the number of mental health professionals.
Distinct boundaries defining community psychiatry of
the past 50 years have become blurred. Managed care
approaches are being applied in both public and
private settings. It is harder to define community
psychiatry. Is it the distinct community based care
for persons who suffer from a serious and persisting
mental illness, or the care for persons seen in
community mental health centers, or care for persons
paid for by the government funds, or some other
variation? And what about persons receiving publicly
funded state hospital or VA care who continue their
care in the community? In the past two years, the APA
has adjusted its structure to address the changing
faces of psychiatry and community psychiatry from these
many perspectives. In this article, I will try to
explain the five primary ways that community
psychiatry and its issues are addressed within the APA.
The Council on Psychiatric Services was reorganized in
1996 to replace several committees. The Council
coordiated four subcouncils called consortia designed
to address the broad range of psychiatric care. Members
are selected for their expertise and serve for limited,
overlapping terms. Community psychiatry is represented
on the following three consortia: Consortium on Special
Delivery Settings; Consortium on Organized Service
Systems; and Consortium on Funding. The fourth
Consortium is the Consortium of Treatment Issues.
The assembly committee on public and community
psychiatry will have its first meeting at the APA
Assembly meetings in May. This new committee was formed
by merging the Assembly Committee on Community
Psychiatry and the Assembly Committee on Public
Psychiatry. The merger was an early effort by the
Assembly to reorganize and streamline. The merger
had the support of both committees, who felt that
times had changed since these committees were
originally formed and that the needs of the persons
served in public/community psychiatry settings
could be more effectively addressed by a single
committee.
The former Assembly Committee on Community
Psychiatry has been the primary liaison committee
for the AACP.
Cliff Tennison, MD, liaison representative, has
made the bridge between the AACP and the APA work
very well. Several AACP initiatives have made it
from this committee through the Assembly and into
APA official policy or structure. For example,
several years ago, Dr. Tennison submitted
Guidelines for Psychiatric Practice in Organized
Settings of Care. They were eventually approved
by the APA Board of Trustees and are now part of
official APA policy. This past year Dr. Tennison
shared Guidelines for Formulary Management and the
Level of Care Utilization System (
LOCUS ). They were referred to the Council on
Psychiatric Services for further study and for
inclusion in a "Toolbox" for APA members and systems
to use in managing psychiatric care. Dr. Tennison also
reiterated your invitation to share information in
newsletters, which is the reason this column is here.
Other APA activities pertinent to community
psychiatry include the Ethics committee's
recommendation of the
"
Guidelines for Ethical Practice in Organized
Settings," which were recently approved by the
Assembly and the Board. The most notable recent
concerns shared by the AACP and the APA are being
addressed by the APA Committee on Managed Care.
This group has been developing guildelines for
states and other mental health authorities who
purchase managed care services for vulnerable
persons with serious and persistent mental illnesses.
This document is in its final stages of review.
The liaison relationships with the AACP and others
brings depth and focus and effectiveness. Because
of its size and its diversity, the APA must be
vigilant to coordinate and be efficient. In contrast,
the smaller, more focused and more grassroots
approaches of the AACP are valuable and bring seasoned
understanding and vitality. Both the APA and the AACP
benefit from this symbiotic relationship. The APA
benefits from the focused knowledge of the AACP and
the AACP benefits from the size, diversity and
strenth of the APA. There are other meaningful liaison
relationshps within the APA which relate to Community
Psychiatry. The National Alliance for the Mentally
Ill ( NAMI ) and the
National Association for State Mental Health Program
Directors (
NASMHPD ) are two such liaison relationships
which add perspective and focus to the APA.
Psychiatric Services is a monthy APA
journal which was established in 1950 and is
published for mental health professionals and
others concerned with treatment and services for
persons with mental illnesses and mental disabilities.
About two years ago, to be more current with recent
trends, Psychiatric Services changed its
name from Hospital and Community Psychiatry.
For many years this has been the premier professional
journal for professionals working in community and
public settings. The APA also sponsors the Institute
for Psychiatric Services, an annual meeting attended
by about 2,500, many who work in community mental
health settings. There is also the Psychiatric
Services Resource Center, which offers educational
materials such as videotapes for rent.
The organized systems to deliver psychiatric care
are changing. Many of the APA structures and
relationships to deal with community psychiatry
issues have been updated in the past two years.
Liaison relationships with the AACP and others
help keep the APA grounded and focused. The APA
with its diversity, size and organizational
structure appears positioned to address and carry
forward community psychiatry issues with strenth.
Dale Svendsen, MD
American Psychiatric Association
Back to Spring 1998 Table of Contents
|