Stanley Center for the Innovative Treatment of Bipolar Disorder

FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 
ON BIPOLAR DISORDER



Introduction

Proceedings

Bipolar Conferences Home

Friday, June 13, 2003
"Concurrent Rapid Communications Sessions"

Session C - Chair: Giovanni de Girolamo, M.D.
Bibliography

Heterogeneity of Bipolar Disorder: Proposal for 3-spectra Model

Video  |  Audio (Length:  23 min.)

M. Alda1, P. Grof2
1Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada, 2Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Canada

Bipolar disorder is typically viewed as a multifactorial disorder of mood regulation. The aetiology of bipolar disorder is at least partly genetic, with multiple genes involved (oligogenic transmission). Clinical data, treatment studies, as well as biological investigations in bipolar disorder are frequently inconsistent from one study to another. We propose that some of these inconsistencies could be resolved by considering bipolar disorder a syndrome consisting of three main subtypes. The first subtype is the ‘classical’ bipolar disorder characterized by episodic course, and favourable response to lithium prophylaxis. Its phenotypic spectrum would include bipolar I and bipolar II disorders, and recurrent major depression. The second type is a group of conditions with a close link to psychotic disorders. These patients often experience subtle psychotic symptoms even in absence of mood symptoms, they have more chronic clinical course with less favourable prognosis and they rarely stabilize without antipsychotic treatment. The third subtype is characterized by high prevalence of comorbid conditions, including anxiety disorders, higher proportion of bipolar II patients, and rapid cycling. These patients appear to preferentially respond to anticonvulsants such as lamotrigine.  The proposed sub-typing is supported by results of genetic and pharmacogenetic studies. Comparing lithium responders with non-responders and with responders to lamotrigine reveals major differences in clinical picture, presence of co morbid conditions, long term course, or family history. The individual groups should be viewed not as exclusive categories, but rather as partially overlapping clusters. This is also in agreement with the concept of oligogenic transmission in which most susceptibility alleles are common and can be shared among different subtypes. The proposed 3 spectra model can account for some of the discrepant findings in the literature. For instance, results of clinical trials may depend on the proportion of subjects in each category included. Individual groups may be differentially represented in different clinical settings with fewer ‘classical’ patients in academic/tertiary care centres. The proposal offers a set of testable hypotheses as well as a framework for designing research studies and interpreting research data.
Keywords:  bipolar disorder, heterogeneity, treatment response


Prevalence Rates of Medical Conditions in a Bipolar Affective Disorder Population

Video  |  Audio (Length:  22 min.)

H.H. Fenn1, W.O. Williford2, D.R. Evans3, P. Connor4, L. Altshuler5, M.S. Bauer6
1
Stanford University and Palo Alto VA Health Care System, 2VA Cooperative Studies Program, 3Medical College of Georgia and Augusta VAMC, 4VA Cooperative Studies Program, 5UCLA and West LA VAMC, 6Brown University and Providence VAMC

Introduction: Prevalence rates for medical conditions among those with bipolar disorder have not been extensively investigated. A literature review over the past 20 years found diabetes mellitus prevalent among hospitalized bipolar affective patients at a rate 9.9% vs. 3.4% from national norms. There were also two studies on head injuries, and one on cholesterol levels.
Methods: Between 1/1/97 and 12/31/00, 330 subjects were recruited from 11 VA medical centers as part of Cooperative Study #430. Each had been admitted to an acute psychiatric unit with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and an acute manic, depressive, or mixed episode. Inclusion criteria included SCID-confirmed diagnosis and at least 3 acute psychiatric admissions over the prior 5 years. Exclusion criteria included only MMSE < 27 or inpatient hospitalization >6 months in the prior year; no other comorbidities were excluded. Intoxicated veterans were approached for consent after detoxification. Intake assessment included Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID; First et al, 1996) and a battery of interview and self-report instruments. A structured chart review instrument was used to gather medical history from available VA records for the prior 10 years.
Results: Of 233 charts reviewed, prevalence rates above 10% were found for: current hypothyroidism 10.7% and past hypothyroidism 4.3%, current hyperlipidemias 26.0% and past hyperlipidemias 3.0%, current obesity 16.2%, current hepatitis C 12.0%, current osteoarthritis 11.5 % and past osteoarthritis 3.4%. History of head trauma with loss of consciousness was found in 9.0% and current diabetes mellitus in 8.54%. Prevalence rates are compared US population rates and VA patient rates; implications for service utilization, multi-modal treatment, and the use of specific psychotropics (e.g. lithium, atypical neuroleptics, valproate) are discussed.
Keywords:  medical comorbidity, head trauma, hyperlipidaemia.


Validation of the Palm Life Chart: An Electronic Diary for Long-term Monitoring of Bipolar Patients

Video  |  Audio (Length:  18 min.)

L. Schärer, C. Biedermann, S. Dittmann, A. Forsthoff, M. Graf, H. Grunze, V. Hartweg, M. Horn, G. Valerius, J. Walden, J.M. Langosch
Center for the Innovative Therapy of Bipolar Disorder, Department of Psychiatry, University of Freiburg and University of Munich

Introduction: Originally based on Kraepelins early life charts, within the last 20 years, the NIMH-LifeChart Method (LCM) (Post et al. 1988) has evolved into the standard method for long-term monitoring of bipolar patients in clinical and in scientific settings. Its reliability, in a large longitudinal study with more than 600 patients (McElroy et al. 2002). It was also formally assessed (Honig et al. 2001). Most patients report that the LCM is easy to do (Honig et al. 2001, Schärer et al. 2002). This preliminary data is in line with the general impression of clinicians. However, there are two major problems with the LCM. First-for the scientific evaluation of LifeChart data – there is no established method available to use the full potential of the longitudinal data. And secondly, graphical summaries of the data, which become necessary after a month, require a significant amount of work for data entry and processing, exceeding the capacities of every days clinical practice (Leverich & Post 1996).
Methods: The Palm LifeChart (PLC), an electronic LifeChart, based on small palmtop computers was introduced (Schärer et al. 2001) to overcome this problem and to make the benefits of LifeCharting available to patients in everyday clinical practice. 50 patients using the PLC on Palmpilot M100 computers participated in a feasibility and validation study.
Results: More than two thirds of the patients found a high or very high benefit using the PLC. They report that the PLC is easy to use and requires less effort than the LCM. Furthermore, it helps patients to detect arising episodes early and it reflects the efficacy of the treatment. Validation against frequently used psychometric scales (YMRS, IDS-C, GAF and CGI-BP) demonstrates external validity. The international use of the PLC will be discussed.
Keywords:  life chart, Palmpilot, validation.


Non-invasive Assessment of Circadian Rhythms in Remitted Bipolar Patient

Video  |  Audio (Length:  22 min.)

S.H. Jones, D. Hare, K. Evershed
Academic Division of Clinical Psychology, University of Manchester, United Kingdom

Introduction:  Studies have shown that markers of circadian functioning are disrupted in bipolar patients who are acutely ill. In general, the measures used to observe circadian functioning have been invasive and restrictive. There has therefore been a risk that the process of observation in itself has impacted on the circadian variables being measured. More recently it has become possible to measure activity patterns as an indicator of circadian functioning, providing a non-invasive alternative to previous techniques. Disruptions of circadian rhythms have been reported using this approach, but only with bipolar inpatients. This approach has not been used in outpatient remitted bipolar patients, even though most effective psychological interventions (e.g. CBT/IPSRT) share a common theme of increasing the stability of activity patterns in such patients. A recent paper by the lead author has proposed that the impact of circadian disruption on remitted bipolar patients may be mediated by the attributions, which the individual has made about such disruption. This proposal implies that bipolar patients are experiencing circadian disruptions during remission, as well as, at a higher level, during acute phases of illness. The present study therefore investigated whether activity patterns, and therefore circadian functioning, were disrupted in remitted bipolar patients, and also the extent to which this was associated with the level and severity of subsyndromal symptoms. Non-invasive measurement of activity patterns was used as the indicator of circadian functioning.
Methods: Remitted adult bipolar patients, who met SCID lifetime criteria for bipolar disorder, completed self report measures of sleep, activity and symptomatology. They also wore an actiwatch, which recorded patterns of activity over a period of a week. The actiwatch is a small wrist-watch sized device which contains a digital acceleration sensor. This allowed participants to engage in their normal range of daily activities. A comparison group of age and gender matched participants with no psychiatric history, provided control data for this study.
Results: Analyses will be reported comparing data from 20 bipolar patients and 20 age and gender matched controls. Key variables obtained were intradaily variability, interdaily stability, relative amplitude and periodicity. These results are discussed in relation to symptom and sleep data. The significance of these findings with respect to ‘instability’ models of bipolar disorder is also discussed.
Keywords:  circadian rhythms, activity patterns, noninvasive assessment.


Session D - Chair: Holly Swartz, M.D.
Bibliography
Video  |  Audio (Length:  1 min.)

Is Adjunctive CBT Superior to Psychoeducation in the Maintenance Treatment of Bipolar Disorder?

Video  |  Audio (Length:  17 min.)

A.E. Zaretsky, W. Lancee, S.V. Parikh, C. Miller
Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Introduction: Although mood-stabilizing medication is the mainstay of treatment for bipolar disorder, many patients still experience residual affective symptoms, high non-adherence, high relapse and significant psychosocial functional impairment. Only 10% of published articles on psychosocial interventions in bipolar disorder are randomized trials and psychoeducation is currently the most scientifically validated treatment. There is no evidence that more labor-intensive interventions such as CBT are superior to psychoeducation. We analyzed preliminary 6 month follow-up data from a randomized controlled trial comparing adjunctive CBT to psychoeducation in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder, in order to determine if adding CBT to psychoeducation would yield better overall mood stability.
Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial. Male and female bipolar patients 18 to 75 years old with bipolar I or II were entered after they were no longer in a full episode of mania or depression and were on an unchanged regimen of mood-stabilizing medication for 4 weeks prior to entry. All patients received 7 weekly sessions of individual psychoeducation. Patients randomized to CBT received 13 additional weekly sessions of individual CBT based on the Basco & Rush (1996) manual. Medication treatment was monitored naturalistically. The Personal Calendar, a daily mood chart based on the NIMH Life Chart Method was the primary instrument used in determining efficacy. Bad outcome was defined as at least 1 week per month with at least low moderate depressive or low moderate hypomanic symptoms.
Results: Of 87 bipolar patients enrolled, 57 completed 6-month follow-up. Only 3.2% of patients who received 13 additional sessions of adjunctive CBT had poor outcomes whereas 30.8% of patients who received psychoeducation alone had poor outcomes [X2(1)=8.07, p<0.005].
Conclusions: A longer course of adjunctive CBT appears to enhance mood stability more than a short course of psychoeducation alone.
Keywords: CBT, bipolar disorder, psychoeducation. 


Why are Some Depressions Worsened by Antidepressant?

Video  |  Audio (Length:  10 min.)

C. Henry, D. Van den Bulke, N. Demazeau, J. Demotes-Mainard
Hôpital Charles Perrens, Bordeaux, France

Background: Extensive use of antidepressant drugs in the treatment of all forms of depression raises the issue of the real nature of agitated depression. These agitated patients are often worsened by antidepressants (Koukopoulos and Koukopoulos, 1999) and the failure to recognize agitated depression as a mixed state may be responsible for some of these disappointing outcomes. The aim of this study was i) to assess the frequency of mild to moderate manic dysphoric episodes masked by depressive manifestations, ii) to look for the more relevant symptoms helping to differentiate dysphoric from genuine depressive episodes.
Methods: Fifty consecutive patients referred by psychiatrists for a major depressive episode were enrolled in this study. Patients were assessed using the French version of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview 5.0 (MINI 5.0) assessing the suicidal risk and providing DSM-IV diagnosis. Intensity of mood episodes were evaluated using the MADRS and Beck and Rafaelsen Mania scale, as well as the modified hypomania Checklist of Angst.
Results: 21 patients (42%) had typical depression with anhedonia, psychomotor and cognitive retardation (“major depressive episode” (MDE) group) ; 21 patients (42%) had manic (22%), hypomanic (14%) or mixed states (6%) (referred to as the “exalted dysphoric mood” (EDM) group), and 8 patients (16%) had others diagnoses. The treatment leading to recovery was very different between the two affective groups, with a good response for antidepressants (76.9%) in MDE patients (among which 38% had an association with mood stabilizer), whereas the EDM group had a good response to neuroleptics (80.9%) (in association with a mood stabilizer in 85.7%). Five patients (23.8%) in the MDE group and one patient in the EDM group required electroconvulsant therapy. The risk of suicide was not different between the two groups (p=0.7). In order to improve the differential diagnosis between both groups, we have assessed the occurrence of a series of symptoms in these patients. The most frequently encountered (in more than 75%) in the EDM group were: insomnia, decreased shyness, an increased restlessness and irritability, distractibility, subjective experience that thoughts are racing, and the feeling that intensity of emotions is increased.
Conclusions: Some mood episodes with depressive symptoms are worsened by antidepressant treatment because they turn out to correspond to dysphoric manic, hypomanic or mixed states rather than to genuine depressive episodes. This concept is supported by the positive response to antimanic treatment in this latter group. This study provides a set of symptoms (particularly emotional hyperreactivity) that may help to distinguish between these two groups. Moreover, these patients with dysphoric episodes seem to more easily report negative symptoms during consultation, and this may partly account for the high rate of misdiagnoses.
Keywords:  bipolar depression, mixed state, emotional hyperreactivity.


Pharmacological Treatment of Bipolar Disorder: Psychotropic Medication Use in the First 500 Patients in the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorders

Video  |  Audio (Length:  19 min.)

D.J. Hsu1,2, S.N. Ghaemi1,2, M.E. Thase3, S.R. Wisniewski3, G.S. Sachs3,4
1Cambridge Hospital, Cambridge, MA, 2Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 3University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 4Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

Objective: To evaluate medication use in bipolar disorder, including frequency of polypharmacy and the roles of bipolar subtype, history of rapid-cycling, and history of psychosis.
Method: Cross-sectional medication use of the first 500 patients in the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorders (STEP-BD).
Results: 72% received mood stabilizers, most commonly lithium (38%) and valproate (37%). 41% received antidepressants, most commonly bupropion (15%). 30% received neuroleptics, mainly atypical agents (most commonly olanzapine, 14%). Only 11% received mood stabilizer monotherapy. Type I patients were more likely than type II patients to receive mood stabilizers (RR=1.19, 95% CI [1.045-1.36], p=0.005) and neuroleptics (RR=1.25, CI [1.145-1.37], p < 0.001), but less likely to receive antidepressants (RR=0.89, CI [0.80-0.99], p=0.04). Patients with a history of psychosis were more likely to receive mood stabilizers (RR=1.17, CI [1.05-1.30], p=0.01) and neuroleptics (RR=2.20, CI [1.65-2.93], p < 0.001) than patients with no history of psychosis. Notably, antidepressants were used similarly in rapid-cycling and non-rapid cycling patients.
Conclusions: Nearly three quarters of patients received mood stabilizers in treating bipolar disorder, with valproate and lithium equally used. Almost one half received antidepressants, and one third received atypical neuroleptics. Polypharmacy occurred in 89% of patients. Type II patients received less mood stabilizing and neuroleptic, but more antidepressant, treatment. Presence of psychosis predicted more mood stabilizing and neuroleptic treatment. Antidepressants were not used cautiously in rapid-cycling patients.
Keywords:  prescribing patterns, pharmacotherapy, polypharmacy.


Clinical Experience with Topiramate in a Psychiatric-Based Weight Management Program

Video  |  Audio (Length:  18 min.)

S.L. McElroy, R. Kotwal, S. Malhotra, K. King, A. Guerdjikova, S. Wu, K. Harding, J. Capece, N. Rosenthal
University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA

Objective: Assess long-term effectiveness of topiramate (TPM) in a psychiatric-based weight management program.
Methods: Naturalistic data review of all patients seen for weight management between 2000-2002 who were assessed by structured clinical interview for eating and/or mood (depressive and bipolar) disorders and treated with TPM as primary/adjunctive therapy. Topiramate was titrated by 25 mg/wk to median daily dose of 200 mg. Efficacy was assessed by mean weekly binge episodes, CGI-Severity, and weight/BMI.
Results: 148 patients (100% eating + mood disorders; 56% adjunctive therapy), mean age 45 + 10 years and mean baseline weight/BMI 110 + 28 kg/40 kg/m2, were followed for a median treatment duration of 110 days (range 1–688). Patients experienced significant reductions in mean weekly binge frequency to 1.2 binges/week, a 49% change from baseline. Shift analysis of CGI-Severity showed 37% of patients at final visit improved to a normal or borderline-normal rating compared to baseline 0.7%. Patients lost an average of 4.7 kg and BMI fell 1.7 kg/m2. Correlations with associated mood (depressive and bipolar) disorders will be shown. Most common adverse events included paresthesia, fatigue, dry mouth, and taste perversion.
Conclusions: Topiramate appeared effective for weight management in outpatients with obesity associated with eating/mood disorders.
Keywords:  topiramate, eating disorder, bipolar disorder.


Questions for all Panel Members After 4 Presenters
Audio (Length:  33 min.)

Top of Page


Introduction | Proceedings | Bipolar Conferences Home

© The Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine